![]() Their goal was to review and sign off on articles nominated for Featured Article (FA) status. ![]() Since it’s not my intention to call … Continue readingĪround the time that my own editing started to wane, a new organization was created called the Inquisitorius (no, not that one). A note on quotations: while I solicited several well-known Wookieepedians for input on this piece, I also conducted extensive research of the public record. Naturally, I was an active editor as well in those days, but as I’ve already discussed that here previously, I’ll leave my own experiences aside this time. At the time it was launched, I was writing for TheForce.Net, and I squeezed every bit of juice I could out of that position to promote the development of the site, from interviewing the creators to directly requesting new articles in news posts (and the Tonnika sisters are looking pretty good these days, if I do say so myself). ![]() Wookieepedia was founded on March 4th, 2005, and one week from today, it will officially celebrate its tenth anniversary. It continues: “our contributors are volunteers, and will simply go away if the policies are too confusing or too difficult for them to follow.” Procedures are popular to suggest but unpopular to follow, due to the effort required to locate, read, learn and abide by them.” Of course, the wook also takes great pains to clarify that it is not Wikipedia, and just because something is policy at one site doesn’t mean it should be taken for granted at the other nevertheless, the “avoid instruction creep” page remains. Over on Wookieepedia’s version is the following text: “Wookieepedia is not supposed to be bureaucratic. Wikipedia’s page on Instruction Creep cleverly uses the picture of kudzu vines that begins this article as a metaphor for this process. Another concept that brings me back to those early days is Instruction Creep: the bureaucratic process by which rules, procedures, best practices, and so on are slowly codified in response to new circumstances and specific incidents, eventually becoming overwhelming to new users and obscuring the true goals of the organization in question. ![]() Another is Disambiguation, which is probably less well-known as a principle than it is in practice, in the form of articles like Mercury (element) or Razor (clone trooper). A flawed addition is better than no addition. “ Be Bold“, for one-in other words, when in doubt, go ahead and make the edit. For those of us old and crotchety enough to remember the dawn of Wikipedia, certain guiding principles remain hardwired to the concept, no matter how much the world of open-source encyclopedias has evolved in the intervening years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |